I don't see in either of the methodology sections, did every single person answer all 79 questions twice (once with pros and cons, once without)? If not, were they just given a subsample, and how many people answered each question?
Was order randomized? Was the with/without pro- cons- tested within participant or just across participants?
If participants answered both before and after seeing the pros and cons, why are you only showing the "after" condition?
What is "Guaranteed Health Coverage (Public Option)" supposed to mean?
Those are two separate things that have nothing to do with each other.
Survey language is in the first link!
I don't see in either of the methodology sections, did every single person answer all 79 questions twice (once with pros and cons, once without)? If not, were they just given a subsample, and how many people answered each question?
Was order randomized? Was the with/without pro- cons- tested within participant or just across participants?
If participants answered both before and after seeing the pros and cons, why are you only showing the "after" condition?